Page 108 Acute Pain Management
P. 108




In
an
experimental
pain
model
comparing
oxycodone,
morphine
and
placebo,
and
involving

mechanical,
thermal
and
electrical
pain
stimuli
in
skin,
muscle
and
oesophagus,
oxycodone

was
more
effective
than
morphine
for
pain
related
to
mechanical
and
thermal
stimulation
of

the
oesophagus,
suggesting
it
could
be
better
than
morphine
for
visceral
pain
(Staahl
et
al,
2006

Level
II).
One
explanation
of
this
difference
is
that,
in
animal
studies
at
least,
oxycodone
is

thought
to
act
as
a
kappa‐receptor
agonist
(Nielsen
et
al,
2007)
and
these
receptors
may
play
an

important
role
in
the
mediation
of
visceral
pain
(Staahl
et
al,
2006).


Pethidine
Pethidine
(meperidine)
is
a
synthetic
opioid
still
widely
used
even
though
it
has
multiple

disadvantages.
Despite
a
common
belief
that
it
is
the
most
effective
opioid
in
the
treatment
of

renal
colic,
it
was
no
better
than
morphine
(O'Connor
et
al,
2000
Level
II)
or
hydromorphone

(Jasani
et
al,
1994
Level
II).
Similarly,
pethidine
and
morphine
had
similar
effects
on
the
sphincter

of
Oddi
and
biliary
tract
and
there
was
no
evidence
that
pethidine
was
better
in
the
treatment

of
biliary
colic
(Latta
et
al,
2002
Level
IV).

Pethidine
induced
more
nausea
and
vomiting
than
morphine
when
used
parenterally
in
the

emergency
department
(Silverman
et
al,
2004
Level
III‐3)
and
in
the
first
2
hours
after

gynaecological
surgery
(Ezri
et
al,
2002
Level
II).


Accumulation
of
its
active
metabolite,
norpethidine
(normeperidine),
is
associated
with

CHAPTER
4
 neuroexcitatory
effects
that
range
from
nervousness
to
tremors,
twitches,
multifocal

myoclonus
and
seizures
(Simopoulos
et
al,
2002
Level
IV).
As
impaired
renal
function
increases

the
half‐life
of
norpethidine,
patients
with
poor
renal
function
are
at
increased
risk
of

norpethidine
toxicity.
Naloxone
does
not
reverse
and
may
increase
the
problems
related
to

norpethidine
toxicity.
Overall,
the
use
of
pethidine
should
be
discouraged
in
favour
of
other

opioids
(Latta
et
al,
2002).


Tramadol
Tramadol
is
commonly
referred
to
as
an
atypical
centrally
acting
analgesic
because
of
its

combined
effects
as
an
opioid
agonist
and
a
serotonin
and
noradrenaline
reuptake
inhibitor

(Lotsch,
2005).
Although
an
effective
analgesic,
it
may
not
provide
adequate
pain
relief
if
used

as
the
sole
agent
for
the
management
of
moderate
to
severe
acute
pain
in
the
currently

recommended
doses
(Thevenin
et
al,
2008
Level
II).
Tramadol
is
an
effective
treatment
of

neuropathic
pain
with
an
NNT
of
3.8
(Hollingshead
et
al,
2006
Level
I).

Tramadol
given
with
morphine
to
patients
immediately
after
surgery
was
shown
to
be

morphine‐sparing,
but
the
combination
was
infra‐additive
(Marcou
et
al,
2005
Level
II).

The
(+)
enantiomer
of
tramadol
is
the
stronger
inhibitor
of
serotonin
reuptake
and
the
(‐)

enantiomer
the
more
potent
inhibitor
of
noradrenaline
reuptake;
tramadol
is
metabolised
by

CYP2D6
and
the
resultant
active
metabolite,
O‐desmethyltramadol
(or
M1),
is
a
more
potent

mu‐opioid
receptor
agonist
than
the
parent
drug
(Raffa
et
al,
1992;
Lotsch,
2005).
Patients
who

are
poor
metabolisers
may
get
less
analgesic
effect
from
tramadol
(Stamer
et
al,
2003).

Conversely,
carriers
of
a
CYP2D6
gene
duplication
allele
(ultrarapid
metabolisers)
may
be
more

sensitive
to
the
effects
of
tramadol
(Kirchheiner
et
al,
2008).

Coadministration
with
other
drugs
that
inhibit
CYP2D6
may
also
influence
the
effectiveness
of

tramadol.
For
example,
pretreatment
with
paroxetine
in
healthy
extensive
metabolisers

reduced
the
hypoalgesic
effect
of
tramadol
in
an
experimental
pain
model
(Laugesen
et
al,
2005

Level
II).


Inhibition
of
5HT3
receptors
by
ondansetron
also
decreased
the
analgesic
effect
of
tramadol

(Arcioni
et
al,
2002
Level
II;
De
Witte
et
al,
2001
Level
II).




60
 Acute
Pain
Management:
Scientific
Evidence

   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113