Page 229 Acute Pain Management
P. 229




Key
messages

1.
 Intravenous
opioid
PCA
provides
better
analgesia
than
conventional
parenteral
opioid

regimens
(S)
(Level
I
[Cochrane
review]).

2.
 Opioid
administration
by
intravenous
PCA
leads
to
higher
opioid
consumption
(R),
a
higher

incidence
of
pruritus
(R),
and
no
difference
in
other
opioid‐related
adverse
effects
(S)
or

hospital
stay
(S)
compared
with
traditional
methods
of
intermittent
parenteral
opioid

administration
(Level
I
[Cochrane
review]).

3.
 In
settings
where
there
are
high
nurse‐patient
ratios
there
may
be
no
difference
in

effectiveness
of
PCA
and
conventional
parenteral
opioid
regimens
(N)
(Level
I).

4.
 Patient
preference
for
intravenous
PCA
is
higher
when
compared
with
conventional

regimens
(U)
(Level
I).

5.
 The
addition
of
ketamine
to
PCA
morphine
does
not
improve
analgesia
or
reduce
the

incidence
of
opioid‐related
side
effects
(U)
(Level
I).


6.
 Iontophoretic
fentanyl
PCA
may
not
be
as
effective
as
intravenous
morphine
PCA,
with

more
patients
withdrawing
from
studies
because
of
inadequate
pain
relief
(Level
I).

7.
 There
is
little
evidence
that
one
opioid
via
PCA
is
superior
to
another
with
regards
to

analgesic
or
adverse
effects
in
general;
although
on
an
individual
patient
basis,
one
opioid

may
be
better
tolerated
than
another
(U)
(Level
II).

8.
 There
is
no
analgesic
benefit
in
adding
naloxone
to
the
PCA
morphine
solution;
however
in

ultra‐low
doses
the
incidence
of
nausea
and
pruritus
may
be
decreased
(U)
(Level
II).

9.
 The
addition
of
a
background
infusion
to
intravenous
PCA
does
not
improve
pain
relief
or

sleep,
or
reduce
the
number
of
PCA
demands
(U)
(Level
II).

10.
Subcutaneous
PCA
opioids
can
be
as
effective
as
intravenous
PCA
(U)
(Level
II).

11.
Intranasal
PCA
opioids
can
be
as
effective
as
intravenous
PCA
(U)
(Level
II).

12.
The
risk
of
respiratory
depression
with
PCA
is
increased
when
a
background
infusion
is
 CHAPTER
7

used
(U)
(Level
IV).

The
following
tick
boxes

represent
conclusions
based
on
clinical
experience
and
expert

opinion.


 Adequate
analgesia
needs
to
be
obtained
prior
to
commencement
of
PCA.
Initial
orders
for

bolus
doses
should
take
into
account
individual
patient
factors
such
as
a
history
of
prior

opioid
use
and
patient
age.
Individual
PCA
prescriptions
may
need
to
be
adjusted
(U).


 The
routine
addition
of
antiemetics
to
PCA
opioids
is
not
encouraged,
as
it
is
of
no
benefit

compared
with
selective
administration
(U).

 PCA
infusion
systems
must
incorporate
antisyphon
valves
and
in
non‐dedicated
lines,

antireflux
valves
(U).

 Drug
concentrations
should
be
standardised
within
institutions
to
reduce
the
chance
of

programming
errors
(U).

 Operator
error
remains
a
common
safety
problem
(N).









 Acute
pain
management:
scientific
evidence
 181

   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234