Page 330 Acute Pain Management
P. 330




three
RCTs
of
OTFC
confirmed
that
the
optimal
OTFC
dose
correlated
poorly
with
scheduled

or
previous
breakthrough
opioid
doses.
The
only
clinical
indicator
of
breakthrough
dose
was

age;
the
average
final
OTFC
dose
significantly
decreased
with
increasing
age
(Hagen
et
al,
2007

Level
II).
In
one
trial,
where
patients
were
titrated
to
a
successful
dose
of
OTFC
(69%
patients),

OTFC
was
more
successful
than
morphine
in
relieving
breakthrough
pain
and
patients

preferred
OTFC
(Coluzzi
et
al,
2001
Level
II).
A
comparative
study
of
OTFC
and
IV
morphine
for

breakthrough
pain
demonstrated
analgesic
superiority
of
IV
morphine
at
15
minutes
but
not

30
minutes
and
comparable
adverse
effects
(Mercadante
et
al,
2007
Level
III‐1).


A
buccal
tablet
formulation
of
fentanyl
was
superior
to
OTFC
with
respect
to
bioavailability

and
time
to
peak
plasma
concentration
(Darwish
et
al,
2007
Level
II),
and
provided
relief
from

breakthrough
pain
within
10
minutes
(Slatkin
et
al,
2007
Level
II).


9.7.4 Postoperative and procedural pain

Many
of
the
issues
relating
to
postoperative
pain
discussed
in
Sections
1.3
and
9.1
are

particularly
pertinent
in
the
patient
with
cancer.
Cancer
patients
represent
a
high
proportion

of
patients
undergoing
thoracotomy,
breast
surgery,
lymph
node
dissection
from
axillary,

inguinal
or
cervical
regions,
and
limb
amputation,
all
associated
with
persistent
pain

syndromes
that
may
respond
to
various
interventions
in
the
postoperative
period.
In
addition,

cancer
patients
often
will
undergo
radio‐
or
chemotherapy
after
surgery;
both
are
risk
factors

for
chronic
postsurgical
pain
as
outlined
in
Section
1.3.
Chemotherapy
has
also
been

considered
a
risk
factor
for
phantom
limb
pain,
contributing
to
the
higher
incidence
of

phantom
limb
pain
in
children
with
cancer
than
with
trauma
(Smith
&
Thompson,
1995
Level
IV),

but
no
prospective
trials
have
confirmed
this
association.

Identification
of
prior
use
and
tolerance
to
opioids
is
essential
to
ensure
adequate
analgesia
in

the
postoperative
period,
as
discussed
in
Section
11.7.


The
impact
of
analgesic
techniques
on
immune
response,
and
implications
for
cancer

progression,
are
new
areas
of
research.
A
review
of
patients
undergoing
radical

prostatectomy,
comparing
outcomes
after
general
anaesthesia
plus
epidural
analgesia
and

regional
anaesthesia
plus
opioid
therapy,
suggested
a
57%
(95%
CI
17%
to
78%)
lower
risk
of

cancer
recurrence
after
the
use
of
epidural
analgesia
(Biki
et
al,
2008
Level
IV).
Pre‐emptive

CHAPTER
9
 epidural
analgesia
with
lignocaine
and
morphine,
established
prior
to
radical
hysterectomy
for

cervical
cancer,
significantly
reduced
postoperative
pain
and
modulated
the
immune
response

to
surgery
to
a
greater
extent
than
epidural
established
after
peritoneal
closure;
interleukin‐6

rise
was
lowered
and
the
duration
of
interleukin‐2
suppression
was
shortened
(Hong
&
Lim,

2008
Level
II).
Similarly,
different
analgesics
may
have
different
effects
on
postoperative

immune
suppression;
in
animals
(Sacerdote
et
al,
1997)
and
in
humans
(Sacerdote
et
al,
2000

Level
II)
tramadol
resulted
in
reduced
immune
suppression
compared
with
morphine.
The

clinical
implications
of
this
effect
have
not
yet
been
evaluated.


Patients
with
cancer
may
undergo
multiple
painful
procedures
and
attention
to
adequate

analgesia
and
anxiolysis
is
imperative,
to
reduce
anticipatory
stress
prior
to
repeat

interventions.
Simple
techniques
include
use
of
topical
local
anaesthetic,
premedication

or
administration
of
breakthrough
analgesia
in
advance,
and
administration
of
sedation

by
trained
personnel.
Few
trials
have
evaluated
procedural
pain
in
adult
patients
with
cancer.

A
review
of
interventions
to
decrease
pain
during
mammography
identified
seven
RCTs,
but

conclusions
were
few
and
based
on
single
studies
due
to
inability
to
combine
data
from

different
studies
(Miller
et
al,
2008
Level
I).
The
provision
of
prior
information
about
the

procedure,
increasing
self‐control
over
the
degree
of
breast
compression,
and
the
use
of

breast
cushions
all
decreased
pain,
whereas
paracetamol
did
not.


282
 Acute
Pain
Management:
Scientific
Evidence

   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335