Page 90 Acute Pain Management
P. 90




Besides
the
adverse
outcomes
attributed
to
acute
pain
management
interventions,
another

area
of
interest
is
whether
the
adverse
outcomes
of
trauma
and
surgery
might
be
prevented

by
effective
acute
pain
management.
Outcomes
such
as
mortality,
morbidity
due
to

derangements
of
the
cardiovascular,
respiratory,
GI
and
coagulation
systems
and
progression

to
chronic
pain
have
also
been
reported
(see
Section
1.3).



Key
message

The
following
tick
box

represents
conclusions
based
on
clinical
experience
and
expert

opinion.

 Multiple
outcome
measures
are
required
to
adequately
capture
the
complexity
of
the
pain

experience
and
how
it
may
be
modified
by
pain
management
interventions
(U).


REFERENCES
CHAPTER
2
 analog
score
and
morphine
requirements
during
postoperative
intravenous
morphine
titration.

Aubrun
F,
Langeron
O,
Quesnel
C
et
al
(2003)
Relationships
between
measurement
of
pain
using
visual


Anesthesiology
98(6):
1415–21.

Backonja
MM
&
Krause
SJ
(2003)
Neuropathic
pain
questionnaire–short
form.
Clin
J
Pain
19(5):
315–6.

Banos
JE,
Bosch
F,
Canellas
M
et
al
(1989)
Acceptability
of
visual
analogue
scales
in
the
clinical
setting:


a
comparison
with
verbal
rating
scales
in
postoperative
pain.
Methods
Find
Exp
Clin
Pharmacol
11(2):

123–7.

Barden
J,
Edwards
JE,
McQuay
HJ
et
al
(2004)
Pain
and
analgesic
response
after
third
molar
extraction

and
other
postsurgical
pain.
Pain
107(1‐2):
86–90.

Bernstein
SL,
Bijur
PE
&
Gallagher
EJ
(2006)
Relationship
between
intensity
and
relief
in
patients
with

acute
severe
pain.
Am
J
Emerg
Med
24(2):
162–6.

Bombardier
C,
Laine
L,
Reicin
A
et
al
(2000)
Comparison
of
upper
gastrointestinal
toxicity
of
rofecoxib

and
naproxen
in
patients
with
rheumatoid
arthritis.
VIGOR
Study
Group.
N
Engl
J
Med
343(21):
1520–8.

Bouhassira
D,
Attal
N,
Fermanian
J
et
al
(2004)
Development
and
validation
of
the
Neuropathic
Pain

Symptom
Inventory.
Pain
108(3):
248–57.

Bouhassira
D,
Attal
N,
Alchaar
H
et
al
(2005)
Comparison
of
pain
syndromes
associated
with
nervous


or
somatic
lesions
and
development
of
a
new
neuropathic
pain
diagnostic
questionnaire
(DN4).
Pain

114(1‐2):
29–36.

Breivik
EK,
Bjornsson
GA
&
Skovlund
E
(2000)
A
comparison
of
pain
rating
scales
by
sampling
from
clinical

trial
data.
Clin
J
Pain
16(1):
22–8.

Breivik
H,
Borchgrevink
PC,
Allen
SM
et
al
(2008)
Assessment
of
pain.
Br
J
Anaesth
101(1):
17–24.

Cameron
CM,
Scott
DA,
McDonald
WM
et
al
(2007)
A
review
of
neuraxial
epidural
morbidity:
experience

of
more
than
8,000
cases
at
a
single
teaching
hospital.
Anesthesiology
106(5):
997–1002.

Carlson
J,
Youngblood
R,
Dalton
JA
et
al
(2003)
Is
patient
satisfaction
a
legitimate
outcome
of
pain

management?
J
Pain
Symptom
Manage
25(3):
264–75.

Cepeda
MS,
Africano
JM,
Polo
R
et
al
(2003)
What
decline
in
pain
intensity
is
meaningful
to
patients
with

acute
pain?
Pain
105(1‐2):
151–7.

Collins
SL,
Edwards
J,
Moore
RA
et
al
(2001)
Seeking
a
simple
measure
of
analgesia
for
mega‐trials:
is
a

single
global
assessment
good
enough?
Pain
91(1‐2):
189–94.

Cook
AK,
Niven
CA
&
Downs
MG
(1999)
Assessing
the
pain
of
people
with
cognitive
impairment.
Int
J

Geriatr
Psychiatry
14(6):
421–5.

Cruccu
G,
Anand
P,
Attal
N
et
al
(2004)
EFNS
guidelines
on
neuropathic
pain
assessment.
Eur
J
Neurol

11(3):
153–62.

Daut
RL,
Cleeland
CS
&
Flanery
RC
(1983)
Development
of
the
Wisconsin
Brief
Pain
Questionnaire
to

assess
pain
in
cancer
and
other
diseases.
Pain
17(2):
197–210.



42
 Acute
Pain
Management:
Scientific
Evidence

   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95