Page 320 Acute Pain Management
P. 320




Postdural
puncture
headache

15.
There
is
no
evidence
that
bed
rest
is
beneficial
in
the
treatment
and
prevention
of

postdural
puncture
headache
(U)
(Level
I
[Cochrane
Review]).

16.
The
incidence
of
postdural
puncture
headache
is
reduced
by
using
small‐gauge
spinal

needles
and/or
a
non‐cutting
bevel
(U)
(Level
I).
 

17.
Further
high
quality
trials
are
required
to
determine
the
efficacy
of
epidural
blood
patch

administration
in
the
treatment
of
postdural
puncture
headache
(U)
(Level
I),
however

benefit
is
likely
(N)
(Level
II).


The
following
tick
boxes

represent
conclusions
based
on
clinical
experience
and
expert

opinion.

 Opioids
should
be
used
with
extreme
caution
in
the
treatment
of
headache
(U).

 Frequent
use
of
analgesics,
triptans
and
ergot
derivatives
in
the
treatment
of
recurrent

acute
headache
may
lead
to
medication
overuse
headache
(U).


9.6.6 Acute pain associated with neurological disorders

Pain
associated
with
neurological
disorders
is
usually
neuropathic
in
nature,
although

nociceptive
pain
due
to
problems
such
as
muscle
spasms
may
also
occur.
Neuropathic
pain

may
be
acute
or
chronic
and
may
be
due
to
a
lesion
or
dysfunction
of
the
peripheral
nervous

system
(PNS)
(eg
painful
peripheral
neuropathy)
or
the
CNS
(central
pain,
eg
poststroke
pain)

(Loeser
&
Treede,
2008).

Treatment
of
acute
neuropathic
pain
is
based
largely
on
evidence
from
trials
for
the
treatment

of
a
variety
of
chronic
neuropathic
pain
disorders.
Effective
treatments
for
neuropathic
pain

include
TCAs,
anticonvulsants,
membrane
stabilisers,
NMDA‐receptor
antagonists,
opioids
or

tramadol
(see
Sections
4.1
and
4.3.2
to
4.3.6).

Associated
psychosocial
problems
and
physical
disabilities
must
also
be
managed
within
a

multidisciplinary
framework.

Multiple sclerosis
CHAPTER
9
 Chronic
pain
is
experienced
by
49%
to
73.5%
of
patients
with
multiple
sclerosis
(Osterberg
et
al,


2005;
Hadjimichael
et
al,
2007;
Khan
&
Pallant,
2007;
Brochet
et
al,
2009)
and
the
type
of
pain
may

vary.
In
one
survey,
central
pain
was
reported
in
27.5%
of
patients
(17.3%
of
these
had

trigeminal
neuralgia);
another
20.9%
had
nociceptive
pain
and
2.2%
described
peripheral

neuropathic
pain
(Osterberg
et
al,
2005).
In
another
survey,
of
those
patients
with
chronic
pain,

60.7%
had
dysaesthetic
pain
and
just
6.6%
reported
nociceptive
pain
(Khan
&
Pallant,
2007).


Pain
related
to
trigeminal
neuralgia
responds
to
carbamazepine
(Wiffen
et
al,
2005
Level
I).

Cannabinoids
reduced
the
intensity
of
neuropathic
pain
associated
with
multiple
sclerosis
by

approximately
1.5/10
(VAS
or
verbal
numerical
rating
scale
[VNRS]),
compared
with
placebo;

there
were
significant
side
effects,
particularly
dizziness
(Iskedjian
et
al,
2007
Level
I).
Safety

concerns
regarding
cannabinoid
use
need
to
be
considered.
There
was
no
evidence
to
guide

the
use
of
antispasticity
agents
such
as
baclofen
in
the
treatment
of
multiple
sclerosis‐related

acute
pain
(Shakespeare
et
al,
2003
Level
I).
Nortriptyline
was
as
effective
as
transcutaneous

nerve
stimulation
in
reducing
pain
intensity
and/or
sensory
complaints
in
patients
with

multiple
sclerosis
(Chitsaz
et
al,
2009
Level
II).
Levetiracetam
was
effective
in
reducing
pain
in

multiple
sclerosis
(Rossi
et
al,
2009
Level
II).





272
 Acute
Pain
Management:
Scientific
Evidence

   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325