Page 49 Volume 20 - N3 - 2012
P. 49
Dor (2012) 20
dos seus utilizadores através de, por exemplo, Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. Vol. 2. Nova
Iorque: Plenum; 1989. p. 161 -99.
adaptação dos instrumentos já existentes 8. Shepley M, Harris DD, White R. Open -bay and single -family
para avaliar a perceção da qualidade am- room neonatal intensive care units. Environ and Behav. 2008;
biental e construção e validação de outros 40(2):249 -68.
adequando -os às especificidades ambien- 9. Chaudhury H, Mahmood A, Valente M. The Effect of Environmental
tais das Unidades de Dor. Design on Reducing Nursing Errors and Increasing Efficiency in
Acute Care Settings. A Review and Analysis of the Literature. Envi-
2. Criar programas de intervenção com equipas ron and Behav. 2009;41(6):755 -86. © Permanyer Portugal 2012
multidisciplinares (e.g. psicólogos, arquitetos, 10. Blomkvist V, Eriksen C, Ulrich R, Rasmanis G. Acoustics and psy-
engenheiros, utilizadores, entre outros) que chosocial environment in intensive coronary care. Occup Environ
Med. 2005;62(3):e1.
vão ao encontro das necessidades dos seus 11. Malenbaum S, Keefe F, Williams A, Ulrich R, Somers T. Pain in its
utilizadores promovendo o seu bem -estar, environmental context: Implication for designing environments to
enhance pain control. Pain. 2008;134:241 -4.
saúde e satisfação. 12. Fornara F, Bonaiuto M, Bonnes M. Perceived hospital environment
quality indicators: a study of orthopaedic units. J Environ Psychol.
Bibliografia 2006;26:321 -34.
13. Andrade C, Lima M, Fornara F, Bonaiuto M. What Is a Hospital With
1. Arneill A, Devlin AS. Perceived Quality of Care: the influence of the Environmental Quality? - Validation and Further Development of a
waiting room environment. J Environ Psychol. 2002;22:345 -60. Hospital Environment Quality Perception Measure. J Environ Psy-
2. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment [Internet]. The chol. 2012.
role of hospital design in the recruitment, retention and performance 14. Ghiglione R, Matalon B. O Inquérito. Teoria e Prática. Oeiras: Celta
of NHS nurses in England; 2004. Disponível em: www.cabe.org.uk Editora; 2001.
3. Rashid M, Zimring C. A Review of the Empirical Literature on the 15. Vala J. A análise de conteúdo. Em: Silva AS, Pinto JM, eds. Metodo-
Relationships Between Indoor Environment and Stress in Health logia das ciências sociais. Porto: Edições Afrontamento; 1986. p.
Care and Office Settings. Problems and Prospects of Sharing Evi- 101 -28.
dence. Environ and Behav. 2008;40(2):151 -90. 16. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psy-
4. Ulrich R. View through a window may influence recovery from sur- chol Meas. 1960;20(1):37 -46.
gery. Science. 1984;224(4647):420 -1. 17. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision
5. Ulrich R. Effects of healthy facility interior design on wellness: The- for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;
ory and scientific research. J Healthc Des. 1991;3:97 -109. 70(4):213 -20.
6. Ulrich R. Effects of healthcare environmental design on medical 18. Devlin AS. Staff, patients, and visitors: Responses to hospital unit
outcomes. Em: Dilani A, ed. Design and Health: Proceedings of the enhancements. Em: Nasar J, Grannis P, Hanyu K, eds. Proceedings
Second International Conference on Health and Design. Estocolmo, of the 26th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Re-
Suécia: Svensk Byggtjanst; 2001. p. 49 -59. search Association. Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA; 1995. p. 75 -80.
7. Shumaker SA, Pequegnat W. Hospital design, health providers, and 19. Evans G, McCoy J. When Buildings Don´t Work: The Role of Archi-
delivery of effective health care. Em: Zube EH, Moore GT, eds. tecture in Human Health. J Environ Psychol. 1998;18:85 -94. Sem o consentimento prévio por escrito do editor, não se pode reproduzir nem fotocopiar nenhuma parte desta publicação.
DOR
48