Page 40 Volume 16 - N.1 - 2008

C. Mendes: Problemática da Avaliação Regular da Dor Aguda no Pós-Operatório
– Parâmetros fisiológicos: constituem os indi- Pain Management Coordinating Committee, Veterans Health Admin-
istration. Revised edition. October 2000.
cadores de dor menos sensíveis. 6. McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. Mosby, Inc; 1999.
7. Debra B, Gordon RN, et al. American Pain Society Recommenda-
Conclusão tions for Improving the Quality of Acute and Cancer Pain Manage-
ment - American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force. Arch Intern
Quando um doente refere dor, é da responsa- Med. 2005;165:1574-80.
bilidade do profissional de saúde aceitar e res- 8. Wilson PR, Caplan RA, Connis RT, et al., for the American Society
peitar o que ele diz e efectuar uma avaliação e of Anesthesiologists, Task Force on Pain Management, Chronic Pain
terapêutica adequadas. Section. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management. Anesthe-
siology. 1997;86(4):995-1004.
Se bem que a existência concreta ou não de uma 9. Acute Pain Management Guideline Panel: Acute Pain Management
UDA organizada e os distintos meios ao dispor de in Adults: Operative Procedures. Quick reference guide for clini-
cada hospital e serviço possam condicionar a ava- cians, AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0019. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health
and Human Services; 1992.
liação da dor, devemos tentar uniformizar os méto- 10. McCaffery M. Nursing practice theories related to cognition, bodily
dos e os critérios de avaliação desta, para que um pain, and man-environment interactions. Los Angeles; 1968. Univer-
mínimo de esforço e de recursos possam gerar o sity of California at Los Angeles Student’s Store.
máximo de resultados válidos. Só assim se poderá 11. American Geriatrics Society. The management of chronic pain in
older persons: AGS panel on chronic pain in older persons. J Am
tirar conclusões que possam ser úteis a todos. Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(5):635-51
Devemos pesquisar a existência de limitações 12. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief
Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:129-38.
à capacidade de comunicar ou de usar os nos- 13. Cleeland CS. Measurement and prevalence of pain in cancer. Sem-
sos instrumentos de medida e adaptar a lingua- inar Oncol Nurs. 1985;1:87-92.
gem à compreensão do doente; utilizar escalas 14. Breitbart W, Rosenfield B, Passik S, et al. A comparison of pain report
e indicadores de dor adequados à população a and adequacy of analgesic therapy in ambulatory AIDS patients with
and without a history of substance abuse. Pain. 1997;72:235-43.
estudar. Avaliar doentes incapazes de nos dize- 15. Dalton JA, McNaull F. A call for standardizing the clinical rating of pain
rem qual a intensidade da sua dor requer o uso intensity using a 0 to 10 rating scale. Cancer Nurs. 1998;21:46-69.
de indicadores menos fiáveis. Convém lembrar 16. Syrjala KL. Integrating medical and psychological treatments for
que a dor é subtratada mesmo em doentes que cancer pain. Em: Chapman CR, Foley KM, eds. Current and emerg-
ing issues in cancer pain: research and practice. Nova Iorque:
se conseguem exprimir bem, quanto mais nos Raven Press; 1993.
que não se queixam adequadamente. Se houver 17. Grossman SA, Sheidler VR, Sweeden K, et al. Correlation of patient
alguma razão para suspeitar de dor, uma tenta- and caregiver ratings of cancer pain, J Pain Symptom Manage.
1991;6:53-7.
tiva de analgesia pode ser um teste simultanea- 18. Hadjistavropoulos HD, Ross MA, von Baeyer CL. Are physicians’ratings
mente diagnóstico e terapêutico . of pain affected by patients’ physical attractiveness? Soc Sci Med.
9
1990;31(1):69-72.
A mensagem essencial sobre a avaliação ál- 19. Cohen FL. Postsurgical pain relief: patients’ status and nurses’
gica é fácil de resumir: perguntar aos doentes medication choices. Pain. 1980;9:265-74.
sobre a sua dor, aceitar e respeitar o que eles 20. Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK, et al. Pain and its treatment in
out-patients with metastatic cancer, N Engl J Med. 1994;330:592-6.
dizem, analgesiar e voltar a perguntar-lhes sobre 21. Levine FM, De Simone LL. The effects of experimenter gender on
a sua dor. Constitui um círculo de avaliação, pain report in male and female subjects. Pain. 1991;44:69-72.
intervenção e reavaliação. Sem isto, muitos con- 22. McCaffery M, Ferrell BR. Patient age: does it affect your pain-control
tinuarão a sofrer desnecessariamente. decisions? Nurs. 1991;21(9):44-8.
De outro modo, para resumir em tom de graça 23. Ng B, Dimsdale JE, Rollnick JD, et al. The effect of ethnicity on
prescriptions for patient-controlled analgesia for post-operative pain.
alguns dos problemas a considerar na avaliação Pain. 1996;66:9-12.
analgésica, direi que podemos ensinar ao doen- 24. Hola K, Cohen F, Dudas S, et al. Effect of personal pain experience
on pain assessment. Image J Nurs Acholar. 1989;21:72-5.
te o que fazer para ser «melhor analgesiado»: 25. McCaffery M, Ferrell BR, O’Neil-Page E. Does life-style affect your
«referir dor compatível com o diagnóstico, evitar pain-control decisions? Nurs. 1992;22(4):58-61.
mostrar a sua ansiedade ou depressão, parecer 26. McCaffery M, Ferrell BR. How would you respond to these patients
in pain? Nurs. 1991;21(6):34-7.
idoso mas resistente, não admitir consumo de 27. McCaffery M, Ferrell BR. Nurses’ knowledge of pain assessment and
drogas de qualquer espécie, ser fisicamente management: how much progress have we made? J Pain Symptom
pouco atraente, fazer caretas de dor, coxear, Manage. 1997;14(3):175-88.
escolher médicos e enfermeiros com experiên- 28. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Pain
management standards; 2000. Standard PE1.4.
cias pessoais de dor intensa e livrar-se de ser 29. American Pain Society & National Pharmaceutical Council. Pain:
criança, mulher ou de uma minoria étnica» . current understanding of assessment, management and treatments.
6
APSociety.pdf; 2001.
Bibliografia 30. Hall GM, Salmon P. Patient-controlled analgesia: who benefits? An-
aesthesia. 1997;52:401-2.
1. Field MJ, Cassel CK, eds. Committee on Care at the End of Life. 31. Parmalee PA, Smith BD, Katz IR. Pain complaints and cognitive
Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, status among elderly institution residents. J Am Geriatr Soc.
DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1997. 1993;41:517-22.
2. Campbell J. Pain as the 5th vital sign [presidential address]. Amer- 32. Ferrell BA, Ferrell BR, Rivera L. Pain in the cognitively impaired
ican Pain Society; November 11 1996. nursing home patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995;10:591-8.
3. Jacox AK, Carr DB, Chapman CR, et al. Acute Pain Management: 33. Porter FL, Malhotra KM, Wolf CM, et al. Dementia and response to
Operative or Medical Procedures and Trauma Clinical Practice pain in the elderly. Pain. 1996;68:413-21.
Guideline No. 1. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Hu- 34. Acute Pain Management Guideline Panel: Acute Pain Management in
man Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1992. Infants, Children and adolescents: Operative and medical procedures.
AHCPR publication 92-0032. Quick reference guide for clinicians, AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0019. Rock-
4. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Pain ville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health
management standards. Effective January 1, 2001. Available at: www. Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.
jcaho.org/standard/pain_hap.html. Accessed September 2001. 35. McGrath PJ, Beyer J, Cleeland C, et al. Report of the subcommittee DOR
5. Booss J, Drake A, Kerns RD, et al. Pain as the 5th Vital Sign Toolkit. on assessment and methodological issues in management of pain
Geriatrics and Extended Care Strategic Healthcare Group, National in childhood cancer. Pediatrics. 1990;5 Suppl 2:814-7. 39